This study generally seems to prove including a relationship (t = dos

This study generally seems to prove including a relationship (t = dos

The latest detailed analytics from, and you may inter-correlation matrix one of, independent variables are provided inside Desk I. Mean thinking range from 2.ninety-five getting observed individual argument (PPC) so you’re able to 5.68 private profile (PR). Regularity distribution of one’s output (perhaps not revealed here but considering up on request) because of the answering teams suggests ISM with thirty-two.8 %, CLM having 31 per cent, ASQ which have percent and you can APICS that have 16.1 percent. In the event the output was categorized by-job titles, almost 34 % originated movie director levels, followed closely by directors (20.1 percent), CEO/President/COO (19 percent), likewise have strings professionals (8 per cent), buyers and you can representatives (5.dos per cent per) while others (3.4 percent).

Pertinent analytics on the various demographic details try placed in Table II. Along team which have a particular spouse selections from just one 12 months to half a century that have an indicate regarding 8.couple of years (median = six many years). The common “man-days” for each and every partner spends deal with-to-deal with is mostly about 97 “man-days” per year (median = 25 months) which have a wide adaptation anywhere between someday to just one,800 weeks. Over 74 percent of their organization could have been renewed between zero so you can completely. It would appear that hardly any have chain people individual stock out of the people; just one.07 per cent off participants owned the fresh partner’s inventory. (1)

The OLS regression model was used to test Hypothesis 1 through Hypothesis 6. The model appears to be fairly satisfactory with adjusted R-square (0.756) and F-value (56.5, p < 0.01) and seems to support that the research model fits well into the data. The results from OLS regression are summarized in Table III.

A positive relationship, ergo, is expected

Consistent with H1, a respondent firm’s asset specificity (RAS) is negatively related to trust in the partner, but the relationship is marginally significant (p < 0.1). It is assumed that the firm's concern about a partner's investment in specific assets is the main route that lowered its trust in partners, given that opportunistic behavior is always possible.

The second hypothesis was also supported. The partner’s asset specificity (PAS) has a significantly positive impact on trust (t = 3.475; p < 0.01).

The firm you are going to believe exchange-certain assets spent by the the lover given that a great dedication to help you the relationships, and it will become an intellectual response to new commitment to improve its believe with the spouse

Behavioral uncertainty (BU), measured by decision-making uncertainty, is negatively associated with trust in a partner as hypothesized (t = -5.202; p < 0.01). Therefore, H3 is supported. The impact of behavioral uncertainty on trust and other subsequent business decisions is becoming more important due to the increasing uncertainty in the ever-changing business environment in the post-modern world. Continuous, two-way communication should be implemented so as to lower the level of uncertainty in supply chain partnerships.

Information sharing has been cited by many studies (e.g, Bowersox et al. 2000) as the most critical agent in the trust-building process of supply chain implementation. 438; p < 0.05). Also, a path analysis was conducted in order to confirm the mediating role of information sharing on behavioral uncertainty, and the degree of relationship between behavioral uncertainty and trust. The result is shown in Figure 2. The path model seems to be acceptable based on several benchmarking statistics. The model appears to indicate that information sharing reduces the degree of uncertainty (t = -4.146; p < 0.01), which in turn enhances the level of trust (t = -; p < 0.01). Accordingly, H4 is supported.

As expected in H5-A, the level of perceived satisfaction (SAT) has a positive and significant impact on the level of trust (t = 2.482; p < 0.05). Any business relationship that results in a sustained degree of satisfaction usually creates an environment where the trust-building process becomes much more conducive. This study seems to support such an argument.